I
|
n an article
written for technologyreview.com, David Talbot traces how the Obama campaign used
new media to help secure the 2008 Democratic nomination. In particular, Talbot
highlights the efficiency and effectiveness of Obama’s social networking site www.my.barackobama.com, or MyBO. Developed
by Blue State Digital, MyBO powered the Obama political machine, helping Obama
rake in donations and allowing supporters to organize locally and get out the
vote. As Talbot writes: “The MyBO databases could slice and dice lists of
volunteers by geographic microregion and pair people with appropriate tasks,
including prepping nearby voters on caucus procedures.” Further, using MyBO,
the Obama campaign managed phone banks, dividing massive call lists into scores
of small “chunks” that local enthusiasts could access online. Probably most
importantly, MyBO’s user-friendly and interactive fund-raising tools bankrolled
the campaign, setting records along the way. As Talbot details: “By July 2008,
the campaign had raised more than $200 million from more than a million online
donors.” Finally, the Obama campaign leveraged established social networking
sites like Facebook and MySpace and viral Internet sites like YouTube to
distribute media, including Obama’s speeches and the candidate’s overarching
message.
To be clear, the Obama campaign did not “invent” online
political networking. Indeed, the brains behind MyBO first developed a similar
site for Howard Dean’s failed but nonetheless groundbreaking (in terms of its
use of the web to raise money) 2004 presidential campaign. Moreover, Obama’s
competition—first Hillary Clinton and then Republican John McCain—all developed
web strategies. What Obama did do was recognize social networks’ true power and
then make well-managed networks of supporters the core of his campaign (by
contrast, Clinton, who sat atop the party establishment, relied more heavily on
traditional campaigning methods like big-ticket fund-raising).
Obama’s 2008 online march to the presidency (and
later his 2012 campaign for re-election) not only transformed campaigning but
also presented profound implications for his presidency. In an article
written for nytimes.com, David Carr
points out that Obama’s “open-source campaign” created so much online popular
support (and transformed that support into offline initiatives) that
special-interest groups, lobbyists and even, at least to some extent, the
Democratic Party now face an administration that “owes them nothing…and can
take its case directly to its base [via the Internet].” Talbot, writing
before Obama entered the Oval Office, also hints at the effects of using social
networking sites to build a political (data) base. He writes: “If Obama wins
but doesn’t govern according to the principles of openness and change, as
promised, supporters may not be so interested in serving as MyBO foot soldiers
[in the future].” Or as David Carr puts it: “There is sense of ownership, a kind of possessive entitlement, on the
part of the people who worked to elect him. The shorthand for his organizing
Web site, ‘MyBO,’ says it all.”
The effects of social networking on Obama’s campaign and presidency—and on American politics in general—brings me to a related topic that I discuss in my
next entry: the danger to democracy associated with the so-called “Online Filter
Bubble.”
It is nothing short of a stroke of genious to use the internet and social networking the way the Obama Campaign did in the 2008 election. It's about time politicians reached out to the masses with their agenda. I for one would never have known about Obama's agenda without it since he was completely unknown to me at the time. It also supports his "progressive" campaign and the whole "Yes We Can" attitude. A new precedent has been set for future campaigns. I only hope the parties in the running make proper use of this strategy and the "bubble" doesn't necessarily affect the general opinion. I look forward to reading your next entry.
ReplyDelete